The Geography of Transport Systems
Jean-Paul Rodrigue (2013), New York: Routledge, 416 pages.
ISBN 978-0-415-82254-1
Appendix - Methods in Transport Geography
Transportation is not a science, but a field of inquiry and application. As such, it tends to rely on a set of specific methodologies since transportation is a performance driven activity and this performance can be measured and compared. Transportation planning and analysis are interdisciplinary by nature, involving among others, civil engineers, economists, urban planners and geographers. Each discipline has developed methodologies dealing with their respective array of problems. Still, transportation is an infrastructure intensive activity, implying that engineering has been the dominant methodological paradigm for transportation studies.
Transport-Related Methods
Multidisciplinary Methods
  • Adams, T.M., Koncz, N.A., and Vonderohe, A.P (2001) Guidelines for the Implementation of Multimodal Transportation Location Referencing Systems. NCHRP Report 460, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Arlinghaus, S. L., W. C. Arlinghaus, and F. Harary (2001) Graph Theory and Geography: An Interactive View. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • BTS (2001) Special Issue on Methodological Issues in Accessibility, Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol. 4, No. 2/3, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Sept/Dec.
  • Burns, L. D. (1979) Transportation, Temporal, and Spatial Components of Accessibility. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Butler, J.A. (2008) Designing Geodatabases for Transportation, Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
  • Cambridge Systematics (2007) Quick Response Freight Manual II, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Planning and Environment Technical Support Services for Planning Research.
  • Chan, Y. (2005) Location, Transport and Land-Use: Modelling Spatial-Temporal Information, New York: Springer.
  • Cliff, A.D. and J.K. Ord (1981) Spatial processes: models and applications, London: Pion.
  • Colwell, P. F. (1982) "Central place theory and the simple economic foundations of the gravity model", Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 541-546.
  • Duncan, O.D and B. Duncan (1995) "A methodological analysis of segregation indexes" American Sociological Review. 20, pp. 210-17.
  • Environmental Protection Agency (1997) Evaluation of Modeling Tools for Assessing Land Use Policies and Strategies, EPA420-R-97-007, Ann Arbor, MI: EPA.
  • FHWA (2001) Transportation Performance Measures Toolbox, Operations, Federal Highway Administration.
  • Fotheringham, A.S. and M. E. O’Kelly (1989) Spatial Interaction Models: Formulations and Applications. London: Kluwer Academic.
  • Fotheringham, A.S., P. J. Densham, and A. Curtis (1995) "The zone definition problem in location-allocation modeling". Geographical Analysis, 27 (1), pp. 60-77.
  • Guimera, R. and Amaral L.A.N. (2005) "Cartography of complex networks: modules and universal roles", Journal of Statistical Mechanics, No. 2.
  • Hansen, W. G. (1959) "How Accessibility Shapes Land Use", Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 25, pp. 73–76.
  • Hines, P., S. Blumsack, E. Cotilla Sanchez and C. Barrows (2010) The Topological and Electrical Structure of Power Grids. 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1-10.
  • Holmes, T.J. (2006) "The Diffusion of Wal-Mart and Economies of Density", University of Minnesota, Department of Economics. 
  • Huff, D.L. and G.F. Jenks (1968) “A Graphic Interpretation of the Friction of Distance in Gravity Models”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 814–824.
  • Isard, W. (1956) Location and Space-Economy: a general theory relating to industrial location, market areas, land use, trade, and urban structure, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Jiang B. and Claramunt C. (2004) "Topological analysis of urban street networks", Environment and Planning B, Vol. 31, pp. 151-162.
  • Kansky, K. (1963) Structure of transportation networks: relationships between network geography and regional characteristics, University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Research Papers 84.
  • Kuby, M. and N. Reid (1992) "Technological change and the concentration of the U.S. general cargo Ports System: 1970-88", Economic Geography. 68(3), pp. 272-288.
  • Lo, C.P. and Yeung, A.K.W. (2002) Concepts and Techniques of Geographic Information Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Marshall, J.U. (1989) The structure of urban systems, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Miller, H.J. and Shaw, S.L. (2001) Geographic Information Systems for Transportation: Principles and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nystuen J.D. and Dacey M.F. (1961) A graph theory interpretation of nodal regions, Regional Science Association, Papers and Proceedings 7, p. 29-42.
  • Oum, T.H. et al. (1992), "Concepts, Methods and Purposes of Productivity Measurement in Transportation", Transportation Research - A, 26A(6), pp. 493-505.
  • O’Kelly, M.E. (1998) "A geographer's analysis of hub-and-spoke networks", Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 171-186.
  • Pellet, R. (1966) Initiation à la théorie de graphes. Vocabulaire descriptif, Paris: Entreprises moderne d’édition.
  • Preston, R.E. (1985) "Christaller's Neglected Contribution to the Study of the Evolution of Central Places", Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 9, pp. 177-193.
  • Putman, S. (1983) Integrated Urban Models: Policy Analysis of Transportation and Land Use, Pion, London.
  • Putman, S. (1991) Integrated Urban Models 2: New Research and Applications of Optimization and Dynamics, Pion, London.
  • Rushton, G. (1984) "Use of location-allocation models for improving the geographical accessibility of rural services in developing countries". International Regional Science Review 9 (3), pp. 217-240.
  • Shaw, S-L. (2002) Book Review: Geographic Information Systems in Transportation Research, Journal of Regional Science, 42(2), pp. 418-421.
  • Shaw, S-L. (2011) "Guest Editorial - Geographic information systems for transportation: an introduction", Journal of Transport Geography, 19(3), pp. 377-378.
  • Shaw, S-L. (2010 "Geographic information systems for transportation: from a static past to a dynamic future", Annals of GIS, 16(3), pp. 129-140.
  • Skszek, S. (2001) "State of the Art" on non-Traditional Traffic Counting Methods, Arizona Department of Transportation, report FHWA-AZ-01-503.
  • Taaffe, E., H.L. Gauthier and M.E. O'Kelly (1998) Geography of Transportation, 2nd Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Thill, J.C. (ed.) (2000) Geographic Information Systems in Transportation Research, Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
  • Thiry, B. and Tulkens, H. (1989), "Productivity, Efficiency and Technical Progress. Concepts and Measurement", Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 60(1), pp. 9-42.
  • Torrens, P.M. (2000) How Land Use - Transportation Models Work, Working Paper 20, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London.
  • TRB (1994) Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board (
  • Ullman, E.L. (1956) "The Role of Transportation and the Bases for Interaction", in W.L. Thomas jr. et al. (eds) Man's Role in Changing the Face of the Earth, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • United Nations (2003) Cost Benefit Analysis of Transport Infrastructure Projects. New York: United Nations.
  • Vickerman, R. (2007) “Cost-Benefit Analysis and Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects: State of the Art and Challenges”, Environment and Planning B, Vol. 34, pp. 598-610.
  • Victoria Transport Policy Institute, "Defining, Evaluating and Improving Accessibility", Transport Demand Management Encyclopedia,
  • Waters, N.M. 2006. Network and Nodal Indices: Measures of Complexity and Redundancy: A Review. In A. Reggiani & P. Nijkamp (eds) Spatial Dynamics, Network and Modelling, Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
  • Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H. (1998) "Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks", Nature 393 (6684): 440–442.
  • Weisbrod, G. (2007) Models to Predict the Economic Development Impact of Transportation Projects: Historical Experience and New Applications, Working Paper, Economic Development Research Group.
  • Wilson, A. G (1974) Urban and Regional Models in Geography and Planning. London: Wiley.
  • White R. and Engelen G. (1993) "Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns", Environment and Planning A, Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 1175 – 1199.
  • Zeiler, M. (1999) Modeling our World: The ESRI Guide to Geodatabase Design, Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.