Source:
adapted from Rodrigue, J-P, T. Notteboom and A. Pallis (2010) “The Financialization
of the Terminal and Port Industry: Rediscovering Risk”, International
Association of Maritime Economists.Value Propositions behind the Interest of Equity Firms in Transport
TerminalsThe rationale for the growing involvement of the financial sector
is clear, at first because terminals are more capital intensive
since the
asset has an intrinsic and operational value. The substantial
levels of productivity brought by containerization have resulted in
a much more capital intensive industry depending on financing not just
for the acquisition of assets, but also for operations. The amortization
of investments tends to take place over longer periods of time implying
a more direct involvement and oversight of financial firms. Terminals
in landlord ports became particularly attractive investments as land
lease arrangements in these ports allow investors to acquire exclusive
user rights on prime port sites for the entire duration of the lease
term, which typically ranges between 25 and 40 years for larger terminals.With the growth of international trade, transportation became an
increasingly profitable industry, not necessarily in terms of rate of
return but mostly in the volume of this return. This attracted the attention
of financial firms, such as banks, insurance companies and even pension
funds, seeing transportation assets, such as port terminals, as an investment
class part of a diversified global portfolio permitting risk
mitigation. A reason why pension funds became interested in
terminal assets was that the time horizon of the investment, such as
a concession agreement, corresponded to their time horizon, which is
long term. This helped to provide large quantities of capital to develop
intermodal assets and an increase of their value. Scale factors also
played. Global financial firms were looking at opportunities large enough
to accommodate the vast quantities of capital at their disposal and
terminals represented an asset class that suited well the scale of this
allocation. Therefore, both the capital time and scale prospects of
the maritime industry were in synchronism with the prospects of the
financial industry. With the growth of international trade, transactions
between commercial actors became increasingly complex and reliant on
financing.