Source:
adapted from Ashar (2009).
Transshipment Patterns
There are three main patterns in the setting of transshipment
hubs:
- By-passing. Mainly because of insufficient
volume a port call may be dropped along a pendulum route and
replaced by a feeder service. It could also concern a port that
is judged not productive enough for the original pendulum
service. For instance, on the above figure port B is dropped
from a pendulum route. The amount of throughput handled at the
hub A now includes twice the throughput handled at port B since
each container imported or exported at port B must be handled at
port A. For instance, a pendulum service along the western
European northern range calling Felixstowe, Le Havre and
Rotterdam could see Le Havre being dropped and replaced by a
feeder service from Rotterdam.
- Tail Cutting. Involves a similar rationale
than by-passing, but in this case the furthest port along a
pendulum route is dropped to be replaced by a feeder service.
The main rationale is an attempt to rationalize the
performance of the pendulum route by removing the additional
delays servicing the last port along the chain implies. For instance, a pendulum
service calling from Asia to Antwerp and finally Hamburg could
see Hamburg being dropped and replaced by a feeder service from
Antwerp (likely covering several ports of the Baltic Sea).
- Hub-and-Spoke. Concerns the most
significant change in the service pattern as a "pure"
transshipment hub can emerge as the only port call
within a regional market. The ports no longer directly serviced
are now part of a new a smaller pendulum route that acts as a
feeder for the transshipment hub. For instance, several ports
along the Mexican Gulf Coast could be serviced by a
transshipment hub in the Caribbean (e.g. Kingston).
Thus, in the case of by-passing and tail cutting the port
selected for transshipment is not generally a transshipment hub as
it still handles a substantial amount of gateway throughput.
Usually, transshipment account for at most 30 or 40% of the port
throughput. However, in the case of a hub-and-spoke structure, a
real transshipment hub commonly emerge where transshipment can
easily account for 90% of all the throughput.