| |
Ownership |
Port admin. |
Nautical mgmt. |
Port infrastr. |
Super-structure |
Cargo handling |
Pilotage |
Towage |
Mooring services |
Dredging |
| Public Service Port |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Tool Port |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Landlord Port |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Corporatized Port |
Public responsibility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Private Service Port |
Private responsibility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Source: adapted from The World Bank (2007) Port Reform Toolkit, Second
Edition.
Public and Private Roles in Port Management
There are five main port management models based upon the respective
responsibility of the public and private sectors. They include the public
service port, the tool port, the landlord port, the corporatized port
and the private service port. Each of these models concerns ports that
have different characteristics concerning the ownership of infrastructure,
equipment, terminal operation and who provides port services such as
pilotage and towage. While service and tool ports mostly exist to promote
public interests, landlord ports attempt to balance public and private
interests. At the other end of the spectrum, private service ports are
maximizing the interests of their shareholders.
- Public service ports. The port authority of
public service ports performs the whole range of port related services,
in addition of owning all the infrastructure. They are commonly
a branch of a government ministry and most of their employees are
civil servants. Some ancillary services can be left to private companies.
Because of the inefficiencies they are related with, the number
of public service ports has declined.
- Tool ports. Similar in every aspect to a public
service port, the tool port differs only by the private handling
of its cargo operations, albeit the terminal equipment is still
owned by the port authority. In several cases, a tool port is a
transitional form between a public service port and a landlord port.
- Landlord ports. Represents the most common
management model where infrastructure, particularly terminals, are
leased to private operating companies with the port authority retaining
ownership of the land. The most common form of lease is a concession
agreement where a private company is granted a long term lease in
exchange of a rent that is commonly a function of the size of the
facility as well as the investment required to build, renovate or
expand the terminal. The private operator is also responsible to
provide terminal equipment so that operating standards are maintained.
- Corporatized ports. Concerns ports that have
almost entirely been privatized, with the exception that ownership
remains public and often assumed as a majority shareholder. The
port authority essentially behaves as a private enterprise. This
management model is unique since it is the only one where ownership
and control are separated, which lessens "public good" pressures
landlord port authority are facing and "shareholder value" pressures
private ports are facing.
- Private service ports. The outcome of a complete
privatization of the port facility with a mandate that the facilities
retain their maritime role. The port authority is entirely privatized
with almost all the port functions under private control with the
public sector retaining a standard regulatory oversight. Still,
public entities can be shareholders and thus gear the port towards
strategies that are deemed to be of public interest.