| Factor |
Cause |
Consequence |
| Technology |
Containerization & IT |
Modal and intermodal innovations; Tracking shipments and
managing fleets |
| Capital investments |
Returns on investments |
Highs costs and long amortization; Improve utilization to
lessen capital costs |
| Alliances and M&A |
Deregulation |
Easier contractual agreements; joint ownership |
| Commodity chains |
Globalization |
Coordination of transportation and production (integrated
demand) |
| Networks |
Consolidation and interconnection |
Multiplying effect |
Integrated Transport Systems: From Fragmentation to Coordination
The notion of integrated transport systems received a lot of attention, particularly
with improvements in the capacity, efficiency and reliability of freight transport
systems. The conventional fragmented and sub-optimal freight transport systems
have substantially been improved. A process of coordination of freight transport
is taking place. Several factors can be pondered:
- Technology has been a prime driving force. Containerization is without
any doubt the most significant technological factor behind a more efficient
coordination of transport modes. Innovations include modes, such as post-panamax
containerships or double-stacking trains, but also intermodal equipment to handle
significant transshipment demands. Hard (technical) assets require soft (management)
assets. Information technologies have gone a long way to help improving the
level of control over supply chains, which includes important aspects such as
tracking shipments and managing fleets. The issue of e-commerce has particularly
received attention.
- Freight transportation is a capital intensive sector with high entry
costs for the maritime and rail segments. The amortization of modes and infrastructures,
particularly terminals, has to be spread over a significant time period, sometimes
over more than a decade. This environment is prone to risks and many potential
investors are unwilling to commit capital for infrastructure projects. This
a reason why the government has often been called to step in. Still, freight
transport companies are dominantly private entities and must rely on capital
markets to finance their ventures. If through a higher level of coordination
with other elements of the supply chain a greater quantity and stability in
utilization can be secured, capital costs can be reduced and financial returns
improved. Thus, intermodal projects have potentially a lower capital risk.
- Coordination also implies new forms of relationships between freight
forwarders. This was favored by the deregulation of many transport modes in
the early 1980s. The Aviation Deregulation Act (1979), the Staggers
Act (1980), the Motor Carrier Act (1980) and the Ocean Shipping Act (1984)
are
significant landmarks in this direction. It became easier for different transport
operators to establish contractual agreements. Mergers / acquisitions within
the same mode started to take place, mainly in maritime and rail transportation,
but also modal and intermodal alliances.
- Globalization has permitted the emergence of a structure of production,
often known as global commodity chains or global production networks.
This structure requires a high level of coordination. It is thus expected that
this production structure imposes a similar structure of distribution where
coordination between modes and different transport systems is required. Under
such circumstances, transport demand should
increasingly be considered as integrated.
- Finally, integrated transport systems rely on the respective strengths of
each transport networks. Since networks are expensive to build and operate,
linking them promotes efficiency and a higher level of control. This can be
considered as a multiplying effect where the efficiency of the whole intermodal
network is higher than the sum of its parts.