Forces Shaping the Diffusion of Information and Communication Technologies
in Freight Transportation
Three forces among others shape the diffusion and application of
ICT over freight transport systems:
- Path dependency. Transport systems are the
outcome of substantial capital accumulation in assets that takes
place over decades and that shapes operations and additional investments.
There are sunk costs within freight transport systems that future
innovation cannot effectively bypass. Infrastructures have been
built, modes selected and specific locations have been reinforced
through the development of intermodalism. Thus, as the level of
asset accumulation increases, sunk costs incite a path dependency
where innovation, or at least the options available, are increasingly
limited. More than any other transport technology in history, containerization
has geared global freight distribution in a path dependency that
undermines future paradigm shifts towards new forms of distribution,
but which is still significantly prone to incremental improvements.
- Asymmetry. Different actors have different
level of access to information, which results in unequal power relations.
A common pattern is that large transport firms have more information
and the capacity to use it than small firms, for the simple reason
that they operate a larger network and are thus able to better understand
and shape the systems they are operating in. Asymmetry is also a
competitive advantage as firms will not reveal comprehensive information
about their general costs and operational characteristics (e.g.
capacity, scheduling) to their customers and competitors. Competitiveness
tends to alleviate asymmetry since competing firms will reveal more
information about their services to capture and retain customers.
Still, firms are reluctant to reveal their market intelligence and
operational knowledge, which are essentially their business model.
This is particularly the case for their deficiencies (such as spare
capacity) which would enable customers and competitors to gain a
temporary advantage. While there is always a price discovery mechanism
at play influenced by market forces, several freight transportation
systems operate in an oligopolistic environment, particularly the
international segment, so a level of obfuscation is implicitly part
of business strategies. Even with ICT, asymmetry is likely to endure
in global freight transport systems as it enables a better level
of information control within firms.
- Internalization. Concerns an ICT strategy established
by a firm to help take control of its management and decision making
processes. Information within the firm can thus be more efficiently
collected, organized and used. Thus, internalization appears to
be a prevalent strategy of ICT development which operates within
the boundaries of the firm, but several channels / conduits can
be established with partners and customers to insure proper interactions.
This can reinforce asymmetry as the more internalized and ICT system
is, the less likely the involved firm will share the information
and the associated business practices. An example of internalization
would be between a maritime shipping company and a terminal operator
that would share information, particularly if they are parent companies
(e.g. Maersk and APM). However, the terminal operator may reveal
little information to the port authority.
There is a particular belief that ICT can help break these forces,
particularly asymmetry, but it is more likely that ICT will reinforce
them. Thus, the outcome will not necessarily be an harmonization of
ICT systems since asymmetry and internalization of powerful forces embedded
into business models, but a convergence towards better interoperability.
The latter opens opportunities to establish specific information exchange
schemes where the concerned players see mutual benefits; where cooperation
provides more returns than competition. Port community systems appear
to be such an endeavor where cooperation leads to efficiency improvements
since the maritime / land interface and its intermodalism are complementary.