Teaching Transport GeographyAuthors: Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue1. Transport Geography EducationTransportation geography is not a science, but dominantly a field
of application. Transport geography has been part of the curriculum
of many geography programs, providing a significant contribution, both
conceptually and methodologically to the discipline and to transportation
studies in general. Indeed, many spatial theories are relying on the
concepts of distance, mobility and accessibility, perspectives on which
transport geography offers a solid background. More recently, transportation
networks and spatial organization issues have been notable contributions
by the discipline to understand contemporary economic and social processes.
The core issue in transport geography education, like any discipline,
is related to relevancy and coherence. How relevant are
the concepts and methods that are being taught and how coherently they
are explained? Substantiating this question requires a critical overview
of concepts, theories and methodologies in transport geography and how
they fulfill the curriculum requirements and also societal needs.The development of modern transport geography curriculum began in
the 1960s with Ned Taaffe and Howard Gauthier among the most significant
contributors in the United States. This curriculum development, virtually
from scratch, led to the seminal textbook, Geography of Transportation
(1973), which brought rigor in the description and optimization of transport
systems. Since, transport geography education has evolved with the priorities
and concerns of the public and private sectors with the focus shifting
increasingly to global issues, but still acknowledging that they
are deeply rooted in the local. The importance of supply chain management
and logistics is a reality of contemporary world economics. This leads
to provision of education in technical expertise related to information
technology, inventory management and transport management. The objective
is to provide knowledge and skills across business areas and industrial
sectors within a supply chain context. This situation is conducive to
programs in transport management shifting towards logistics management.
More importantly, transport geographers must be able to anticipate rather
than follow policy needs.Where transportation geography is taught has also a significant
impact on the curriculum since the geographical setting changes the
modal focus. Under such circumstances,
transport geography education must reflect the realities of the regional
transport system as it is optimally the market in which students will
find potential employment. In the case of Hong Kong, rail transportation
has little importance and most of the focus is on public transit and
international transportation issues. In the case of several European
countries, the perspective tends to be more policy oriented. European
governments tend to have a more direct involvement over their transport
systems through public and semi-public agencies. Transport geographers
can thus be involved in the decision-making process in the public and
private sectors through policy evaluation and formulation. The European
emphasis is fairly different from the more privately owned system in
North America where deregulation has been a dominant paradigm since
the last 20 years.2. Curriculum ApproachesThe last 50 years have seen the creation of a solid curriculum in
transport geography, as a sub-discipline to human and economic geography.
Expanding the transport geography curriculum into the 21st century will
require a continuation of this tradition with new conceptual and
methodological initiatives since new problems will arise and new
perspectives will be developed. To tackle with these issues, a new generation
of transportation geographers will obviously have to be trained with
a particular emphasis on analytical and methodological perspectives.
Economic integration and sustainability issues are receiving growing
attention in the transport geography curriculum.The quantitative revolution that spurred in the 1970s has
led to a variety of methodological and technical dimensions in geographical
education. Many of these have led to the mathematical abstraction and
quantification of transport geography, but may have substituted for
relevance. Transport geography is a specialized part of spatial analysis
and focused on the importance of integrating analytical tools in the
curriculum. Many of the tools and methods traditionally used in transport
geography, such as spatial interaction, accessibility and network modeling,
are now part of many GIS packages and readily available to investigate
real world problems. GIS-T has become a fundamental part of transport
geography curriculums.A look at geography curriculums also reveals that there are two transport
geographies, one general and the other urban. The latter
comes from the growing influence of Urban Geography in geography curriculums,
and growing traffic problems in cities. However, urban freight is largely
absent from the perspective. In contrast, general transport geography
has a more balanced orientation between passengers and freight, although
modally there are differences, particularly if the approach switches
to an extended geographical scale.The development of concepts, theories and methods is a collective
undertaking which involves seeking a consensus about what is
relevant, but also what has lost of its relevance. From this large pool
of knowledge, the transport geographer brings coherence in a
curriculum by making choices concerning what should be introduced in
accordance to the requirements of a curriculum. This mainly involves
three challenges:
Theoretical and conceptual. The core challenge of transport
geography education is that it must underline how relevant are its
theoretical and conceptual foundations in explaining contemporary
events and processes. Prospects over this issue are very positive
as empirical evidence underlines the growing mobility of people,
freight and information at all geographical scales. This is a good
indication of the relevancy of transport geography and it is thus
important to insure that it clearly gets conveyed to undergraduate
audiences.
Methodological. Another important aspect of transport
geography education obviously relies on how information is analyzed,
which includes a wide array of methods ranging from qualitative
policy analysis to quantitative operations research. Methodologies
previously tended to be taught more from a technical perspective
and often in a very abstract manner. As methodologies are merging
with information technologies there are opportunities to go beyond
abstraction.
Technical and applied. This involves using technology
to replicate techniques and their procedures, but also using technology
for educational purposes. It is quite clear that GIS-T remains a
promising educational tool in transport geography, especially when
it is used to demonstrate methodologies within simulations. Surprisingly
and despite the emphasis educational technologies have recently
received, their level of integration to transport geography education,
even in its simplest form, remains fairly low.
Another challenge resides within the institutional structure, as
transport geography remains what departments and programs commit to
the discipline in terms of human and physical resources. This challenge
is however linked to educational issues as a successful curriculum,
however modest, promotes its own continuation and growth. The question
remains how transport geographers, through their contribution to geographical
education, will make sure the discipline receives a role proportional
to its relevancy.3. Transport Geography in the ClassroomStudents being introduced to a discipline are particularly sensitive
to new concepts, ideas and fields of application brought in the classroom
and which will challenge and even change their vision of the world.
This does not exclude a strong emphasis, with demonstrations and case
studies, that concepts and methodologies are mutually imbedded in any
scientific investigation. Then, it is for the student to make the strategic
decision to pursue this investigation in upper level classes and at
the graduate level. This decision may rarely take place if relevancy
and coherence are not efficiently provided. While relevance is the responsibility
of the whole scientific community, coherence is assumed by individual
transport geographers within the classroom. As always, pertinent
material cannot compensate for a lack of pedagogy.The balance between concepts, methods and applications is obviously
the prerogative of the individual teacher to comply with a program's
stated objectives, but the following approaches can be suggested depending
on the general types of transport geography classes:
General introductory courses. These transportation classes
are generally offered to the undergraduate student population at
large and tend to have no pre-requisites. Considering the wide variety
of students' backgrounds, they tend to be challenging classes but
offer the possibility to attract students into a transportation
or a geography program. Offering such courses should thus be seriously
considered to place transportation issues within an academic community.
Such classes should almost strictly focus on concepts by explaining
the importance of transportation from the local to the global. A
particular emphasis should be placed at presenting the relationships
between transportation and geography, discussing its history, presenting
major modes and terminals, as well as international and urban transportation
systems. Methodological issues should not be discussed in details,
but simply in terms of how they are relevant to the discipline.
Specific introductory courses. Concern regular transport
geography classes part of a geography curriculum. They are commonly
offered at a more advanced level (e.g. second or third year) and
thus assume that the students are already familiar with core geographical
concepts linked to accessibility and spatial interactions. The goal
is to expand these concepts through transportation issues with a
balance between concepts and methodologies. If students have already
received training in GIS, it is possible to provide some GIS-T methodologies
and exercises, but methods can still be solved "by hand" or using
spreadsheets. This web site has specifically been designed for such
a purpose and offers ample material to address a wide range of transport
geography issues.
Topical intermediate courses. Concern specialized classes
often focusing on methods and fields of application. Many have prerequisites
linked with quantitative methods and GIS. They thus offer an opportunity
to teach a selected group of students already familiar with transport
a series of customized concepts and methods. In many programs this
is essentially a GIS-T class, but there are also opportunities to
focus on topics such as supply chain management, urban transportation,
transport policy or transportation and land use.
Advanced courses. They tend to be seminars and offered
to small groups of students, commonly at the graduate level. Many
students come from different programs, such as economics, engineering
or political science, and will take such seminars to expand their
knowledge and help them address their specific research topic. Paradoxically,
these courses tend to be less methodologically oriented and focus
more on policy and management issues. A good approach involves the
analysis of advanced research papers selected to cover the students'
expressed interests. Students can be encouraged to develop projects
in their fields of interest which will lead to a variety of approaches
ranging from advanced methodologies (with GIS-T) to content analysis
that can be presented and debated at the seminar.