Teaching
My academic interests center in two areas.
One is constitutional law, particularly the First Amendment and issues of
Presidential power, and constitutional history, with an emphasis on the
Revolutionary and early national periods. The other is litigation-centered,
and includes civil and criminal procedure and strategy, with a special concentration
on the death penalty.
Thus, I ordinarily teach such courses as:
Constitutional Law, The Constitution and Social Reform, Mass Media and the
First Amendment, The Death Penalty in Contemporary America, Critical Events
in Anglo-American Legal History, Civil Procedure, Pre-trial Litigation,
and Trial Techniques.
Other
I am the Reporter for the American Bar Association’s
Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in
Death Penalty Cases (2d ed., 2003), reprinted in 31 Hof. L.R. 913 (2003).
University Honors
and Awards
Public Interest Achievement Award, Hofstra
Public Justice Foundation, 2005, 2002.
Professor of the Year, Hofstra Law
Review, 2001, 2003.
Stessin Prize for Outstanding Scholarship,
1993-94. Awarded in University-wide competition for article Why Constitutional
Lawyers and Historians Should Take a Fresh Look at the Emergence of the Constitution
from the Confederation Period: The Case of the Drafting of the Articles of
Confederation.
Distinguished Faculty Lecturer, 1992.
Chosen in University-wide competition to deliver lecture based on article
The Law as King and the King as Law: Is a President Immune from Criminal
Prosecution Before Impeachment?
Principal Publications
A. Scholarly
Giarratano is a Scarecrow: The Right
to Counsel in State Capital Post-conviction Proceedings, ___ Cornell
L. R. ___ (forthcoming 2006).
“Leo M. Frank,” in YALE BIOGRAPHICAL DICTIONARY
OF AMERICAN LAW (Yale University Press, forthcoming 2006).
“Articles of Confederation,”
in OXFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LEGAL HISTORY (Oxford University Press, forthcoming
2005).
Mend It or End It?:
The Revised ABA Capital Defense Representation Guidelines as an Opportunity
to Reconsider the Death Penalty, 2 Ohio St. J. Cr. L. 663 (2005).
A Rational Constitutional
Faith (remarks on installation as Distinguished Professor), 33 Hof.
L.R. 417 (2004).
The Revised ABA Guidelines and The Duties
of Lawyers and Judges in Capital Post-conviction Proceedings, 5 J. App.
Prac. & Proc. 325 (2003).
Add Resources and Apply Them Systemically:
Governments’ Responsibilities Under the Revised ABA Capital Defense Representation
Guidelines , 31 Hof. L.R. 1097 (2003).
“Federal Habeas Corpus in Capital Cases,” in AMERICA’S
EXPERIMENT WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT: REFLECTIONS ON THE PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
OF THE ULTIMATE PENAL SANCTION (North Carolina Academic Press, 2d ed.
2003 & 1st ed. 1998) (James Acker et al., eds.).
“Habeas Corpus,”in DICTIONARY OF AMERICAN
HISTORY (Charles Scribner’s Sons, 2003).
Digitized Pornography Meets the First
Amendment , 23 Cardozo L.R. 2011 (2002).
HABEAS CORPUS: RETHINKING THE GREAT WRIT
OF LIBERTY (New York University Press, 2002; published in paperback 2003).
Earl Washington’s Ordeal, 29 Hof.
L.R. 1089 (2001).
Just Because John Marshall Said it, Doesn’t
Make it So: Ex Parte Bollman and the Illusory Prohibition on the Federal Writ
of Habeas Corpus for State Prisoners in the Judiciary Act of 1789 , 51
Alabama L.R. 531 (2000).
Leo Frank Lives: Untangling the Historical Roots
of Meaningful Federal Habeas Corpus Review of State Convictions, 51 Alabama
L.R. 1467 (2000).
Brown v. Allen: The Habeas Corpus Revolution
That Wasn’t, 51 Alabama L.R. 1541 (2000).
Book Review of Christopher N. May’s PRESIDENTIAL
DEFIANCE OF “UNCONSTITUTIONAL” LAWS, 44 Am. J. Legal Hist. 226 (2000).
On Protecting Accountability, 27 Hof. L.R.
677 (1999), an updated version of The Law as King and the King as Law:
Is a President Immune from Criminal Prosecution Before Impeachment?, 20
Hastings Const. L.Q. 7 (1992) .
Remarks at Symposium on the Future of Legal Services,
25 Fordham Urb. L.J. 345 (1998).
“Open Legal Questions Remaining After Iran-Contra,”
in PRESIDENT REAGAN AND THE WORLD (Greenwood Press, 1997) (Eric J. Schmertz
et al., eds.).
Book Review of David Thomas Konig’s DEVISING
LIBERTY, 16 Am. J. Legal Hist. 130 (1997).
A Lot More Comes into Focus When You Remove
the Lens Cap: Why Proliferating New Technologies Make it Particularly Urgent
for the Supreme Court to Abandon its Inside-Out Approach to Freedom of Speech,
and Bring Obscenity, Fighting Words, and Group Libel Within the First Amendment
, 81 Iowa L.R. 883 (1996), partially reprinted as “The Old Problem
of New Communications Technologies: Can We do Better This Time?”, in LAW AND
THE ARTS (Greenwood Press, 1999) (Susan Tiefenbrun, ed.) and as “History and
Decency: Overcoming the Threat of an Inside-Out Approach,” in REAL LAW@VIRTUAL
SPACE: COMMUNICATION REGULATION IN CYBERSPACE (Hampton Press, 1998; revised
for 2d ed. 2005) (Susan J. Drucker and Gary Gumpert, eds.).
The Suspension Clause in the Ratification Debate
s, 44 Buff. L.R. 451 (1996).
GROUP DEFAMATION AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH: THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN LANGUAGE AND VIOLENCE (Greenwood Press, 1995) (edited with Monroe
H. Freedman).
Why Constitutional Lawyers and Historians Should
Take a Fresh Look at the Emergence of the Constitution from the Confederation
Period: The Case of the Drafting of the Articles of Confederation, 60
Tenn. L.R. 783 (1993).
Challenging Law Students Through the Pretrial
Litigation Course: Integrating Learning by Taking a Simulation Approach, and
Letting the Campus Computer Network Help (National Institute for Trial
Advocacy, 1992) (with Andrew Schepard).
Innocence, Federalism, and the Capital Jury,
18 N.Y.U. Rev. Law & Soc. Change 315 (1990-91).
Freedom of Information and the First Amendment
in a Bureaucratic Age, 49 Brooklyn L.R. 829 (1983).
American Libel Law 1825 - 1896: A Qualified
Privilege for Public Affairs?, 30 Chitty's L.J. 113 (1982).
Libel Law and the Preservation of the
Republic 1787 - 1825, 30 Chitty's L.J. 176 (1982).
Book Review of John Hart Ely's DEMOCRACY
AND DISTRUST, 48 Brooklyn L.R. 391 (1982).
Note, The United States and the Articles
of Confederation: Drifting Toward Anarchy or Inching Toward Commonwealth?,
88 Yale L.J. 142 (1978).
Complementarity versus Similarity of Traits
Operating in the Choice of Marriage and Dating Partners, 105 J. Social.
Psyc. 147 (1978) (with Amnon Till).
B. General
Senate Must Shed Light on Detainees’
Rights Bill, Newsday, November 18, 2005.
Justice Imperiled: The Anti-Nazi Lawyer
Max Hirschberg in Weimar Germany (Book Review), The Champion, November
2005.
No New York Execution is in Sight,
Newsday, December 30, 2003.
The Constitutional Archipelago, Hofstra
Chronicle, November 20, 2003.
Peace Pact: The Lost World of the American
Founding (Book Review), N.Y. L.J., June 20, 2003.
Hamdi and the Case of the Five Knights
, Legal Times, February 3, 2003.
A Weakening Judiciary, Natl. L.J.,
November 11, 2002.
The Bush Military Tribunals: Where Have
We Been? Where Are We Going?, Criminal Justice, Summer 2002.
Pixelized Pixies: Chasing Virtual Smut
, Natl. L.J., October 8, 2001, a revision of Pondering Pixelized
Pixies, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, August
2001.
Black-Jewish Relations on Trial (Book
Review), N.Y. L.J., July 10, 2001.
A Tough Call Made Openly and Honestly
, Newsday, December 10, 2000.
Legal Argument Alone Won't Suffice
, Newsday, November 21, 2000.
Wait a Few Months to Judge Senate,
Newsday, January 29, 1999.
The House Botched Impeachment Hearings
, Newsday, November 24, 1998.
House Should Consider Censure Option
, Newsday, September 14, 1998.
Clinton and the Irresistible Urge of History
, Legal Times, August 3, 1998.
Achieving Political Adulthood, Nexus,
Spring, 1997.
The Case Against the Death Penalty, USA Today
Magazine, March, 1997, reprinted in TAKING SIDES (McGraw-Hill 2001) (George
McKenna and Stanley Feingold, eds.).
To Catch a King, Legal Times, March
10, 1997.
The First Amendment Also Applies to Lawyers
, Natl. L.J., September 11, 1995.
Tinkering With the Machinery in Capital
Cases, Natl. L.J., August 23, 1993.
Vertical and Horizontal Separation of
Powers in the Constitution of the United States of America, Europske
a Mezinarodni Pravo ("European and International Law"), Winter, 1992.
Can Justice be Served by Appeals of the
Dead?, Natl. L.J., October 19, 1992.
Habeas Corpus Cases Re-Wrote the Doctrine
, Natl. L.J., August 19, 1991.
Presidential Paradox, Natl. L.J.,
August 12, 1991.
Controlling the Capital Jury: How Much
Rationality is Too Much?, ABA Preview, December, 1989.
Personal Data
Educational Data
Employment Data
Academic Activities
Other Professional Activities
Return to: Eric M. Freedman Home Page