Assuming that the host always chooses to open a door with
a Booby Prize, and would never reveal the Grand Prize,
the possibly surprising answer is that you should
switch to the third door, which is now twice as likely as your
original choice to be hiding the Grand Prize.
This problem can be analyzed using Bayes' theorem or trees
(see "You're the Expert" at the end of
Chapter 7
of
*Finite Mathematics*, Second Edition),
but here is an intuitive argument. When you chose Door A, the
probability that you chose the Grand Prize was 1/3 and the probability
that it was behind one of the other doors was 2/3. By showing you which
of Doors B and C does not hide the Grand Prize (Door B, say), the host is giving
you quite a bit of information about those two doors. The probability
is still 2/3 that one of them hides the Grand Prize, but now you know
which of the two it would be: Door C.
So, the probability is still only 1/3 that
the Grand Prize is behind Door A, but 2/3 that it is behind Door C.

If you find this result counterintuitive (and even most mathematicians do), try running the simulation below. Choose a door by clicking on it. The host (your computer) will then open one of the other doors, revealing a pig. You may then, by clicking on the appropriate door, choose to stick with your choice or switch to the remaining door. After a moment the doors will close to allow you to try again. Below the doors are shown two running calculations: the experimental probability that you will win if you stay with your original choice and the experimental probability that you will win if you switch. After many tries, will these numbers be close to 1/2, or will they be close to 1/3 and 2/3 respectively?

If your browser is Java-capable, press the Java button to run a simulation of the game show above. |