Hofstra logo

College of Liberal Arts & Sciences
Department of Religion
RELI 10 Homepage


RELI 10
PARTICIPATION - OBSERVATION PROJECT



This project has 2 goals. My goal is for you to develop and consolidate a repertoire of transferable skills that will aid you whenever you encounter people of different religions or cultures (even if they are not part of one of the three religions we have studied).

  • First, you will engage with Western religions as they are lived in your world by observing and analyzing their ritual(s) and speaking with practitioners. Part of the point is for you to use on your own academic ways of approaching religion.
  • Second, you will learn how to think through and across differences by
    • Comparing and contrasting two religions – comparison and contrast is one to get yourself to think something new about religion
    • Developing sensitivity toward your own reactions and responses, as well as learn how to grow your own responses into knowledge.


PAPER #1 is due on April 27 at the start of class.
(Optional Revision is due on May 11.)
PAPER #2 is due on our scheduled exam day at the start of the period.  

 

PAPER # 1: The purpose of this step is for you to observe and analyze a religion that you stand "outside" in some way.
DUE April 27 at the start of class! (Worth 20% of your OVERALL COURSE grade). 
Do NOT skip class or come to class unprepared or I will not accept your paper!


WHAT YOU MUST DO:

Attend a religious ritual from one of the religions we are studying that you stand "outside." Attend at least twice.

Then interview someone from EITHER of the rituals you attended. This interview is one opportunity to begin engaging in this dialogue.  Possible questions you might ask are: How do they define themselves (i.e. someone might be more than one religion; or might be Jewish but not necessarily attend synagogue)? How did they become a member of the religion? What does it mean to them to be a member of this religion? How do they understand the role, importance, meaning, etc. of the ritual you attended? What do they consider to be the most important part of their religion? What is the role of community in their experience of religion? How do they live their religion everyday? Which dimension of religion is most important to them: ritual and devotional, ethical and legal, philosophical and doctrinal, emotional and sensuous, narrative and mythic, social and institutional.  As you brainstorm some possible questions, also think about questions that have come up for you as we have been studying different religions but which have remained unanswered--this is your chance!


You can tape the interview, take notes during the interview, or (if these methods seem intrusive) write up notes and observations IMMEDIATELY after the interview is over. DON'T WAIT UNTIL YOU ARE READY TO WRITE THE PAPER--YOU THINK YOU WON'T FORGET, BUT YOU WILL!

WHAT YOU MUST WRITE: Paper #1 has two parts.
PART ONE: RITUAL ANALYSIS (You must use Geertz!)

*** Describe (briefly!) the ritual that you observed (just the high points!) and your reactions to attending a "different" religion from your own. Think about the physical space, how people are positioned with respect each other, and what people do as well as what they say.

Then ***write 3 - 4 pages analyzing the ritual you observed, using the materials we read in class as your guide – especially Geertz! In your analysis you must explain:

  1. What is the story that this group of people (or religion) is telling themselves about themselves? BE SPECIFIC! What kind of world is this story unfolding in? Who are its main characters? What are they struggling with? How does the story end? As you answer these questions, consider not just the ideas, but also the motivations, and moods that are being ritually communicated in this story they tell themselves about themselves. (After all, people are more than their heads! They have hearts and feelings; they commit actions in the world).
  2. HOW are they telling this story? Remember: some of our most powerful lessons come not from what people say, but from what they do!

A tip: I am not looking for a research paper, where you reiterate for me what we have learned about this religion in class. You are already being tested on that material. What I AM looking for is for you to take what we have learned in class – both the facts about this particular religion as well as the academic ways of approaching religion in general – and make that book knowledge your own by using it to think critically about what you actually saw and experienced at the specific ritual you attended. For example, in learning about Judaism we learned about the importance of the idea of covenant in the stories that Jews tell themselves. Did your experience at a synagogue confirm this? If yes, tell me “how?” The how question is the crucial one.


PART TWO: INTERVIEW ANALYSIS

***Write a transcript of the relevant parts of the interview. Do NOT spend a lot of time on this: the purpose if for me to be able to follow your analysis of the interview (your next step).

***Write 2 pages reflecting upon the interview. Do not fill up the pages telling me what the person said; that is why you are giving me an excerpted transcript. Do tell me what you learned. Do tell me how their perspective is different from and/or similar to readings and class discussions. DO tell me how their understanding of the ritual was similar to or different from the analysis you wrote. Most importantly, do reflect upon your experience of talking to someone of a different faith: in what ways did this interview broaden your ability to dialogue across differences--and why? (if it didn't--analyze why not!) What was most difficult for you--and why? If you had to do this assignment again, how might you try to address that difficulty? 

Extra Credit Opportunity: 2 points for EVERY class reading that you use to analyze the ritual that you observed. (Note: You will receive no credit for citing an article that gives the dates of Muhammad's life, for example. You will receive credit for using materials--either about one of the three religions or from the introductory section of the course--in ways that will help you analyze and interpret what is being ritually communicated in the ritual that YOU observe).
Checklist for what you hand in: Ritual Description ___; Ritual Analysis ____; Transcript ____; Interview Analysis ____.

OPTIONAL RE-WRITE:
You have the option of re-writing Paper One and giving it to me no later than May 11. If you do decide to revise, I will replace the old grade with the revised version IF AND ONLY IF you hand in the original as well (so that I can see if and how you incorporated my feedback).  
BEWARE: I am looking for more than grammar changes here. You really need to re-vision your paper by working more carefully and specifically with the Geertz lens of “a story they tell themselves about themselves”! Make me see the specific story they are telling – and how that story constructs their world!
To help me see your changes, you must indicate in bold (or highlighting) what you have changed. If you have not changed at least 1/3 of your paper, I will not consider it for a grade adjustment. (This option does not apply if you failed to turn Step One in).

 

 

 

PAPER # 2: There are Three Parts
Due at the beginning of our scheduled exam day!
(Worth 15% of your OVERALL COURSE grade).


PART #1: USE GROSZ
***Write 2-3 pages using the ideas from the Grosz reading to analyze the ritual you observed. Tell me:

  1. What is the frame? (There might be more than one! Or, there might be one big frame, that includes a lot of little frames). What kind of territory does the frame set up? (Think: ideas, moods, actions).
  2. What does the space of the frame or territory call your attention to? How does it do that?  Why does it do that?
  3. What qualities or energies get intensified by being framed? That is, what new experiences or feelings or actions does the frame create?

PART #2: SELF-ANALYSIS: USE CONNOLLY
***Write 2-3 pages in which you reflect upon your own perspective and role in this project by doing the following:

  1. Briefly describe how you participated or observed in each case and why. When you participated/observed, what do you feel, see, or think? Did you pull back from aspects that were different or were you attracted to differences? Did you find yourself contrasting and comparing this ritual with your own – and if yes, did that help, hurt or do a little of both?
  2. Re-read the Connolly article, paying special attention to resentment and bicameral orientation. (Connolly suggests that resentment arises when we realize that it is precisely our deepest assumptions, commitments, and beliefs that other people, with different lives than ours, find contestable. To counteract that resentment, Connolly suggests that we develop practices to help us adopt a bicameral stance: to be rooted in our own beliefs and commitments while nevertheless being able to see alongside the point of view of others). Then ***write 2-3 pages in which you answer the question: Did this project function as a Connolly-style practice for you? Were you able to adopt a bicameral stance? If not, explain why not: precisely what got in the way? If yes, explain precisely how you got yourself to adopt a bicameral orientation.

PART #3: COMPARISON AND CONTRAST

  1. Re-read the J.Z.Smith handout from our very first day (and your class notes).
  2. ***Write 2 pages in which you compare and/or contrast at least two different religions. (Best is if you compare and contrast the ritual you attended with a ritual that we have studied in class from a different religion).

    A crucial tip: do NOT make a list of similarities and differences. The point of comparing/ contrasting is to help you see something--about each religion or maybe even about religion in general--that you did not see (or see as fully) before you started comparing and contrasting. You MUST draw conclusions from the comparisons and contrasts that you note. A good way to move yourself to this higher level is to brainstorm several different similarities and/or differences and then develop one or two points more fully by asking: so what? What do I learn about religion in general from noticing this similarity/ difference?   


Checklist to hand in: Ritual Analysis using Grosz _____; Self-Analysis using Connolly _____; Comparison/Contrast _____;.


GENERAL PAGE LENGTH GUIDELINES

When I was in college, page lengths meant something (I wrote my papers on a typewriter). With computers, page lengths no longer do: you can change margins, type face, font, etc. Therefore the page lengths that I stipulate in ALL of your written assignments are MINIMUM SUGGESTIONS to let you know that you should not be spending weeks writing a 2 page paper! You CAN go over. (But you go UNDER at your own peril!) 

The rule of thumb is: Are you writing to fill up pages? If you honestly feel what you are saying is essential to your point, then I won't mind reading a page or two more IF what you are saying is good.  If, however, you honestly feel that you are filling up pages in hope of impressing the teacher--you won't and your grade will be dropped accordingly.

Page created by Ann Burlein and last modified December 22 2009..

 

Return to:
          RELI 10 Homepage   RELI 10 homepage

.